The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by the society's secretary, holding he lacked authority to continue after the societyresolved to withdraw the petition and removed him, noting the resolution was not under stay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-2371/17.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2371 OF 2017
New Safalya SRA CHS Ltd. ..Petitioner. Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents.
Mr. Amog Singh, Mr. S P. Brahmbhatt i/b Mr. S. R. Singh for the Petitioner.
Mr. U. S. Upadhyay, AGP for the Respondent-State. Mr. V. D. Patil for Respondent Nos.2, 6, 7 and 8. Mr. M. S. Surana for Respondent No. 9. Mr. Yugal A. Bhatia for intervenor.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : August 8, 2018 .
P. C. :
patilsr
Digitally signed by Sachin Ramchandra Patil Date: 2018.08.10 13:31:22 +0530
1 / 3
Sachin Ramchandra Patil
wp-2371/17.
March 2018. We accordingly heard learned counsel for the Petitioner, learned counsel for the said society, Mr. Surana, learned counsel for Respondent No.9 and Mr. V. D. Patil, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 2, 6, 7 and 8.
2 / 3
patilsr
wp-2371/17.
nor there is order of stay to the said decision from any competent Court of law.
.5 In view of the disposal of writ petition, pending applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are accordingly disposed of.
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
3 / 3
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner can proceed with a writ petition after his employer's general body has resolved to withdraw the petition and removed him from office.
New Safalya SRA CHS Ltd.
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
