Public Interest Litigation dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent and uninterested in continuing the proceedings, with issues kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 48_pil_14_2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.14 OF 2017
Anil Vedvyas Galgali …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
None present for the Petitioner.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 7th AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.:-
None appeared for the Petitioner. On the last occasion also
none appeared for the Petitioner. It seems that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. The petition is therefore, dismissed for non prosecution, keeping open the issue raised in the petition.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
Digitally signed MeghaShridhar by MeghaShridhar ParabDate: Parab 2018.08.0914:08:43 +0530
Megha
1/1
Anil Vedvyas Galgali
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
