A writ petition regarding a tender process was dismissed as the petitioner's grievance was redressed after the respondent counsel confirmed the entire subject tender process was abandoned.
Grievance of the Petitioner raised in the Petition stands redressed and the Petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 17_wpl_854_2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.854 OF 2018
Doric Infra Private Limited …Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Saket Mone i/b. Mr. Kushal Mor for the Petitioner. Ms Jyoti Chavan, AGP for the Respondent -State. Mr. Kamlesh Ghumre with Ms Sonali Sable for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Sagar Patil for the Respondent -MCGM. Mr. G.S. Godbole with Mr. V. Mannadiar and Mr. Siddharth Shenoy i/b. M/s. V. Mannadiar and Co. for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED: 7th AUGUST, 2018.
P.C.:-
Mr. Godbole, the learned counsel for the Respondent No.3,
on instructions makes a statement that entire subject tender process is
abandoned at this stage. The statement is accepted.
raised in the Petition stands redressed at this stage. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(RANJIT MORE, J.)
Megha Digitally signedby Megha Shridhar Shridhar Parab Date: 2018.08.09 Parab 14:12:55 +0530
Megha
1/1
Doric Infra Private Limited
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
MCGM
Respondent No.3
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
