This case is a public interest litigation where the High Court disposed of the petition because the respondent corporations lacked authorization to dump solid wastes at the Mulund site.
rpts that the PIL is disposed of due to lack of dumping authorisation
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
32-PIL-108-2014.DOC
Jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 108 OF 2014
Sewak Trust … Petitioner Versus MCGM & Ors. … Respondents
… Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Mane, AGP for Respondent No.6. Ms. K.H. Mastakar, for Respondent – BMC. Ms. Sharmila Deshmukh, for Respondent Nos. 5 and 7.
CORAM: A.S. OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE: 3RD AUGUST, 2018.
PC:-
1. None appears for the Petitioner. As pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 5 and 7, as of today, there is no authorisation permitting Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation for dumping solid wastes at the site at Mulund. Therefore, there is no reason to entertain this Public Interest Litigation as of today.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) ( A.S. OKA, J )
1/1
Sewaak Trust
MCGM
BMC
A.S. Oka
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court