The petitioner challenged the rejection of his parole application citing his mother's illness. The court examined the medical certificate and parole history, finding the illness not severe enough to justify parole release.
Rule discharged and writ petition disposed of against the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1135 OF 2014
Shirish Anand Wankhede
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent
| Appearances | |
|---|---|
| Ms. Rohini Dandekar | Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner |
| Mr. H.J. Dedia | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 18, 2016.
ORAL ORDER [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
application came to be rejected. The appeal preferred
against the order of rejection came to be dismissed, hence,
this petition. The petitioner has annexed the medical
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 3
certificate dated 8.10.2013 to this petition.
jfoanz vkacsjdj
2 of 3
interfere. Hence, rule is discharged.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj
3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition granting parole to the petitioner based on the illness of his mother warrants interference by the High Court.
Shirish Anand Wankhede
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
