Prashant @ Pintu Murlidhar Chavan v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8 appa 474-16.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 759 OF 2015
Prashant M. Chavan ..Applicant
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra . ..Respondents
Mr. Sanskar Marathe for the Applicant. Mr.H.j.Dedhia, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 18, 2016.
JUDGMENT (PER SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.):
Sessions Case No.169 of 2014 for the offences under Section 302, 143, 147, 148 r/w. Section 149 of IPC has sought suspension of substantive sentence of imprisonment and his enlargement on bail pending the decision of appeal.
1 of 3
salgaonkar
8 appa 474-16.doc
for the State. The applicant, the original accused no.5, has been held guilty of committing murder of Gangadhar Gadade and Gajanan Navghare.
2 of 3
salgaonkar
8 appa 474-16.doc
applicant as well as the role played by him in the incident. Thus, the evidence of this eye witness prima facie shows the complicity of the applicant in committing the gruesome murder of Gajanan and Gangadhar.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
3 of 3
salgaonkar
Prashant M. Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court