Applicant sought bail or expedited hearing of his Criminal Appeal. Court rejected the bail prayer noting no new grounds for reconsideration but expedited the appeal hearing.
Prayer for bail rejected; hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 247 of 2013 expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 484 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 247 OF 2013
Anil Ramdas Borse
Versus
State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
Ms. Sarojini Upadhyay Advocate (appointed) for the Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATE : APRIL 18, 2016.
P.C.:
or expediting the hearing of his appeal i.e Criminal Appeal
No. 247 of 2013.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
preferred an application for bail i.e Criminal Application No. 334 of 2013. The said application came to be rejected by
this Court by order dated 25.6.2013. No new ground has been brought to our notice to necessitate reconsideration of
the prayer for bail, hence, the prayer for bail is rejected,
however, hearing of the appeal is expedited.
5. The application is disposed of in above terms.
lodged in Nasik Road Central Prison.
[ SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be reconsidered given the prior order of rejection.
Whether the hearing of the pending criminal appeal should be expedited.
Anil Ramdas Borse
State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Anuja Prabudeessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
