In a Criminal Writ Petition concerning parole, the High Court refused to interfere as the petitioner was already on parole leave extended up to the date of the hearing, providing no grounds for further relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-ii-wp 849-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 849 OF 2014
Sitaram Dada Sarode .. Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra . ..Respondents
Mr.Yashpal Thakur, Advocate appointed for the Petitioner. Smt.V.R.Bhonsale, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : APRIL 16, 2016.
ORAL ORDER (PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.).
account of illness of his brother. The said application came to be
rejected. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred an appeal
which came to be dismissed by order dated 17th January, 2014.
1 of 2
salgaonkar
7-ii-wp 849-14.doc
parole from 15.07.2014 to 14.09.2014, and thereafter on 21.01.2016. The said period has been extended and as of today the petitioner is on parole leave. In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to interfere. Hence rule is discharged.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
(SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.)
2 of 2
salgaonkar
Sitaram Dada Sarode
The State of Maharashtra
Smt. V.K. Tahilramani
Smt. Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
