Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the public interest litigation as the period of tender had expired. The Court granted leave and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the Petition permitted; Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-pil-23-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.23 OF 2014
Jan Jagran Manch Through Sachind D. Raskar ...Petitioner vs. The Executive Engineer, Public Work Division, Thane and Others ...Respondents
Mr. T. Dande, for the Petitioner
Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2State. Ms. Swati Sagwekar, for Respondent No.3BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 24, 2016
P.C.:
Parties through their counsel.
that the period of tender in question has expired and as such nothing survive in this Petition. In view of the aforesaid, he seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. The Petition accordingly stands disposed of as withdrawn.
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Jan Jagran Manch
The Executive Engineer, Public Work Division, Thane
State
BMC
Shantanu Kemkar
Makarand Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
