PIL No. 73/2015 dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners failed to appear or engage counsel despite notice, indicating lack of interest in proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil73.13.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.73/2015
Ajaz Khan Noor Khan and others ..vs.. Union of India through its Secretary and ors.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 23, 2016
In spite of being duly served with a notice for engagement of another counsel, neither the petitioners have appeared nor engaged any other counsel. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
The Public Interest Litigation is dismissed for want of prosecution.
JUDGE JUDGE
kahale
Ajaz Khan Noor Khan and others
Union of India
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
