In a PIL challenging a Government Resolution making Aadhaar mandatory for school students, the Court observed that the Resolution did not impose penalties for non-possessibility. It found the Resolution not contrary to Supreme Court orders and dismissed the petition as unnecessary to entertain.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-73.15
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.73 OF 2015
Vickram Crishna … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Chetan Mali for the Petitioner. Mrs. Madhubala Kajle, AGP for the Respondent No.1- State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 27th JUNE, 2016
P.C.
. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner. The
learned AGP represents the Respondent. The challenge in this PIL is to the Government Resolution dated 21st April, 2015. The contention is that by the said Government Resolution, obtaining Aadhaar Card for each student admitted in the schools in the State is made mandatory. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner invited our attention to the orders of the Apex Court dated 23rd September, 2013 as well as 16th March, 2015. He also placed on record an order of the Apex Court dated 15th October, 2015.
2 We have perused the impugned Government Resolution. The Government Resolution provides that Aadhaar Card of every
1 of 4
2 pil-73.15
student admitted in every school in the State should be obtained which should be linked with registration number of the students in the general register maintained by the schools. It is stated that if this is done it will ensure that there is no child who does not attend school. Reliance is placed on the provisions of the Right of Free and Compulsory Education to Children Act, 2009.
3 The contention of the Petitioner is that making the Aadhaar
Card mandatory in this manner by the impugned Government Resolution is completely contrary to the orders of the Apex Court.
4 We have perused the orders of the Apex Court. The order
dated 23rd September, 2013 passed by the Apex Court issues the following interim order :-
“In the meanwhile, no person should suffer for not getting the Adhaar card inspite of the fact that some authority had issued a circular making it mandatory and when any person applied to get the Adhaar Card voluntarily, it may be checked whether that person is entitled for it under the law and it should not be given to any illegal immigrant.”
The order records that no person should suffer for not getting an Aadhaar Card. The next order is dated 16th March, 2015. All that it records is that both the Union of India and States should adhere the order passed by the Apex Court on 23rd September, 2013.
2 of 4
3 pil-73.15
Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the order of the Apex Court dated 15th October, 2015 read thus:-
5 Firstly, the PIL Petitioner has not made any representation to the State Government seeking modification of the Government Resolution dated 21st April, 2015. Secondly, we find that the Government Resolution dated 21st April, 2015 does not provide for any adverse consequences if a student enrolled in a school in the State does not obtain Aadhaar Card. It provides that a drive should be conducted for making Aadhaar Cards of the students. The object seems to ensure that no student remains without school education as the Government Resolution provides that Aadhaar Card number should be linked with the general register number of the student in the schools.
6 The State Government is conscious of the orders passed by the Apex Court from time to time. On plain reading of the said Government Resolution, we do not find that Aaadhar Card Scheme is made mandatory by the said Government Resolution. As stated earlier,
3 of 4
4 pil-73.15
no student can be penalised who does not possess Aadhaar Card. As stated earlier, the Government Resolution impugned in this Petition does not provide for such a consequence. Therefore, we are of the view that the act of issuing the said Government Resolution is by itself not contrary to the orders passed by the Apex Court in any manner.
7 If any attempt is made by any authority of the State to commit breach of the interim orders of the Apex Court on the basis of the Government Resolution dated 21st April, 2015, it will be open for the Petitioner to invite attention of the concerned authority of the State to such breaches committed by any authority of the State. In view of the binding orders of the Apex Court in such a case, the State is bound to take necessary action in accordance with law.
8 Subject to what is observed above, we are of the view that it is not necessary to entertain this Petition and the same is disposed of.
(A.A. SAYED, J ) (A.S. OKA, J )
4 of 4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Government Resolution making Aadhaar mandatory for school students is contrary to Supreme Court interim orders regarding the voluntary nature of Aadhaar.
Whether Aadhaar cards of students should be made mandatory for admission in government schools.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vickram Crishna
State of Maharashtra
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
