A PIL filed by Th Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. was allowed to be withdrawn by the High Court, as the relief was identical to another reserved matter.
Leave to withdraw the petition allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.169/2013(36)
1
mnm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 169 OF 2013
Th Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. & Ors. Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Petitioners
...Respondents
Mr. R.R. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioners Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondents
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 27TH JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the
relief claimed in the Petition is almost identical to the relief
claimed in the other Petition in which the matter is already
heard and reserved for judgment. He in the circumstances,
seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. The Petition is allowed
to be withdrawn as prayed. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
2 PIL.169/2013(36)
Th Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
