The Court allowed the withdrawal of a public interest litigation petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, and dismissed the petition as such.
Leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition granted. Petition dismissed as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-pil-86-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.86 OF 2015
V. M. Shenoy ...Petitioner
vs. The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Chaitanya Bhandarkar, for the Petitioner
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATE : JUNE 27, 2016
P.C.:
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition with specific material in regard to the allegations levelled in the Petition and making specific prayer in the relief clause. With the aforesaid liberty, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
1/1
Vishal Parekar
V. M. Shenoy
The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church and Others
SHANTANU KEMKAR
MAKARAND KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
