The High Court of Bombay dismissed Public Interest Litigation No. 20 of 2014 for want of prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear on the date fixed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-pil.20.2014
1/1
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.20 OF 2014
AamAadmi Party and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus MHADA and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 12th FEBRUARY, 2016
P.C. :
date when the matter was called out, neither the petitioners nor their
counsel remained present.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
AamAadmi Party
MHADA
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
