Mr. Rausaheb Khanderao Powar and Ors. v. Kolhapur Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
pil-132-15
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 132 OF 2015
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 124 OF 2015
Mr. R. K. Powar and ors. Vs.
.. Petitioners
The Commissioner Kolhapur Municipal Corporation and ors. .. Respondents
Mr. R. S. Apte, Sr. Counsel i/by Mr. Y. P. Narvekar for petitioners. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for State.
Mr. Rajiv Chavan, Sr. Counsel i/by Mr. D. V. Sutar for applicant in CAI No.124 of 2015.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL & A. A. SAYED, JJ.
FEBRUARY 17, 2016.
P.C.
of 2013 dated 11/12/2013 and the decision taken by the State and a communication made on 13/3/15 (Exh. KK). The State decided not to extend the local municipal limits of Kolhapur Municipal Corporation. It is submitted that by a Resolution dated 11/6/2015, Kolhapur Municipal Corporation resubmitted the proposal for extension of local limits, which is
2
pil-132-15
pending consideration by the State Government.
petitioners, submits that the State be directed again to pass appropriate order on the said proposal. Learned Senior Counsel Shri Chavan, appearing for the applicant-intervener, submits that such a request need not be entertained again and again. State has already taken a decision on the earlier proposal filed by the Corporation.
decide the proposal in a time bound frame. The State will deal with the issue in an appropriate manner and in accordance with law.
(A. A. SAYED, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL,J.)
Mr. R. K. Powar and ors.
Mr. Rajiv Chavan
The Commissioner Kolhapur Municipal Corporation and ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court