The Court allowed a notice of motion for condonation of a 30-day delay in filing an appeal in an arbitration-matters suit. The Court clarified that condonation does not stay the pending arbitral proceedings.
Notice of motion for condonation of delay allowed; clarification that no stay on arbitral proceedings is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
NMA 145 of 2016.sxw
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 145 OF 2016
IN
APPEAL (L) No.680 OF 2015 IN LEAVE PETITION No.150 OF 2015 IN SUIT (L) No.516 OF 2015
Vivanti Private Limited and Ors. ...Applicants/Appellants (Org. Plaintiffs)
Vs.
S.E. Investment Limited and Anr. ...Respondents (Org. Defendants)
Mr.Vicky Pahuja i/b. Naik Naik & Co. for Applicants/ Appellants Ms. Deepali Jadhav for Respondents
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 11, 2016
P.C. :
Appellants and the learned counsel for the Respondents.
2/2 NMA 145 of 2016.sxw
learned counsel for the Respondents has vehemently opposed the notice of motion for condonation of delay. We are of the view that the delay caused in filing the appeal should be condoned for the reasons stated in paragraphs 4,5,6 and 7 of the affidavit in support of the notice of motion. Hence, notice of motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed of. 3.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a 30-day delay in filing the appeal.
Vivanti Private Limited and Ors.
S.E. Investment Limited and Anr.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
