Public Interest Litigation disposed as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to take permissible steps in law.
Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to take permissible steps in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
PIL48-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Public Interest Litigation No.48/2014
(Shilpesh Ramesh Dhurve and ors. .vs. State of Maharashtra and others. )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's orders
Mr. T.D.Mandlekar Advocate with Mr. R.V. Malviya, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. C.A. Lokhande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1,2 & 8.
Mr. Deogade, Advocate h/f Mr. S.K. Mishra, Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 6. Mrs. S.S. Jachak, Advocate for Respondent No.5. Mr. A.A. Naik, Advocate for Respondent No.13. Ms. Sarkar, Advocate h/f Mr. S.V.Sirpurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.14-A.
Mr. P.S. Chawhan, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 14 B-I & II. Mr. R.S. Kurekar, Advocate for Respondent No.14 (B-II).
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : February 11, 2016.
After hearing Mr. Mandlekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners at length when we expressed not to entertain the present petition in our public interest litigation jurisdiction, Mr. Mandlekar seeks liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to take such steps as are permissible in law.
Public Interest Litigation No.48 of 2014 is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Shilpesh Ramesh Dhurve and ors.
State of Maharashtra and others
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
