Single judge disposed of PIL No. 123 of 2012 regarding improvement of higher education, holding that the impugned order no longer survives as the Board of Studies' term had ended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
23-pil-123-2012
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CI VILJURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO 123 OF 2012
Joint Action Committee for …. Petitioners improvement of Higher Education of Maharashtra and Ors.
versus
The Chancellor, University of Mumbai & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr.Mihir Desai for Petitioner. Mr.Rui Rodrigues for Respondent no.1. Mr.Imam Culkuttawala, AGP for the State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND P.D.NAIK, JJ. DATE : 15h April, 2016.
P.C.:
It is brought to our notice that the Honourable Chancellor has acted upon report of the Joint Action Committee which was submitted to him on 13th April, 2012. In any case, the term of the Board of Studies has already come to an end.
(P.D.NAIK, J.) (A. S. OKA, J.)
Joint Action Committee for rrpillai and Ors.
The Chancellor, University of Mumbai
A.S.OKA
P.D.NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
