The High Court allowed the civil application restoring a family court appeal that had been dismissed for non-prosecution, basing the decision on reasons recorded in a related civil application.
Restoration of the family court appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cam-76-16.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 76 OF 2016 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.206 OF 2007
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Mr. Shardul Singh i/b. Mr. R. A. Kale and Mr. Gajendra S. Kadam, Advocate for the Applicant – Appellant (Husband).
Mr. Y. S. Bhate, Advocate for the Respondent (Wife).
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND P.D. NAIK, JJ. DATED : APRIL 13, 2016.
P.C.
For the reasons recorded while allowing Civil Application No.75 of 2016 in Family Court Appeal No.205 of 2007, this application deserves to be allowed by restoring the Appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer Clause (a).
(P.D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the family court appeal, originally dismissed for non-prosecution, should be restored.
Husband
Wife
A.S. Oka
P.D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
