A family court appeal was disposed of upon acceptance of consent terms tendered and signed by both parties and their respective advocates who were personally present in court.
The appeal is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
fca-82-08.doc
rpa 1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.82 OF 2008
Mrs. Rajshree M. Khatau .. Appellant
Versus
Miten Khatau .. Respondent
Mr. Bhairavi Waravdekar a/w. Mr. Vivek Kantawala a/w. Mr. Tonya Goveas i/b. M/s. Vivek Kantawala & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Vishal Kanade i/b. M/s. Keystone Partners, Advocate for the Respondent.
…... CORAM : A.S. OKA AND P.D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 13, 2016.
P.C.
Consent Terms are tendered by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The Consent Terms are duly signed by the Appellant and the respondent as well as their respective advocates. It is pointed out that the Appellant and Respondent are personally present in the Court. They accept the correctness of the contents of the Consent Terms. The undertaking incorporated in the Consent Terms are accepted. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
fca-82-08.doc
rpa 2/2
2 Accordingly, Appeal is disposed of in terms of the
Consent Terms.
3 Decree be drawn up accordingly.
Mrs. Rajshree M. Khatau
Miten Khatau
A.S. OKA
P.D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
