This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38.16PIL
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
______________________________________________________ 52 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.38 OF 2016
MUSLIM SHAH CHAPPARBAND SAMAJIK VIKAS
MANDAL THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr.Joshi
Hrishikesh A
G.P.for Respondents/State: Mr.A.B. Girase.
...
CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
Dated: APRIL 13, 2016
Heard.
2This petition has been filed for
recalling the order of the Government
withdrawing the Circular dated 16th
February, 2015. Upon careful perusal of
the said circular, it appears that, the
Government of Maharashtra has taken a
decision to cancel the Government Circular
dated 23rd March, 2011 on the basis of the
decision dated 4th December, 2014 passed
38.16PIL
2
by Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench in
Writ Petition 2802 of 2014.
3In that view of the matter, we are
unable to persuade ourselves to entertain
this Public Interest Litigation.
4Hence, the Public Interest Litigation
stands disposed of.
(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J)(S.S. SHINDE, J)
kadam/
Muslim Shah Chapparband Samajik Vikas Mandal Through Its President
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court