The PIL was disposed of. Prayers C to E stood satisfied as the District Collector cancelled the sports club licence following an enquiry and offences were registered against the respondent. No other main prayer existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
43.16PIL
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 43 OF 2016
LAXMAN MAKKAJI KUNDALWADE
VERSUS
THE PARSHURAM SOCIAL AND SPORTS CLUB THROUGH
ITS AUTHORISED PERSON AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M.G. Deokate
h/f Mr.Padalkar Harshad H.
GP for Respondent/State :Mr. A.B. Girase
Advocate for Respondent no.1 : Mr. U.R. Awate
h/f Mr. S.B. Talekar
...
CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ. Dated: April 16, 2016
...
PER COURT :-
Heard.
2.We have carefully perused the reply
filed by the Respondents. The Respondent
Authorities have already cancelled the
licence issued in favour of Respondent No.1
for running the Sports Club at village
Naigaon(D), Tq. Dharmabad, Dist. Nanded, as
per the order dated 25th January, 2016 passed
by the District Collector, Nanded. The
licence is cancelled after due enquiry.
43.16PIL
Offences are also registered against
Respondent No.1. In that view of the matter,
prayer clauses `C' to `E' in the Petition
stand satisfied. There is no other main
prayer in the Petition.
3.In that view of the matter, the
P.I.L. stands disposed of.
(SANGITRAO S. PATIL, J.)(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
SGA
LAXMAN MAKKAJI KUNDALWADE
THE PARSHURAM SOCIAL AND SPORTS CLUB
S.S. SHINDE
SANGITRAO S. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court