Dismissed
Indian Council of Investors v. Union of India and 5 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/16/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.16-2014
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 16 OF 2014
Indian Council of Investors ..Petitioner. Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. Anupam Dighe i/b Shriranjg Paranjpe for Petitioner. Mr. Parag Vyas for Respondent Nos.1,4 & 5.
Mr. Yogesh Chande with Mr. Varun Maniyar i/b Economic Laws Practice for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL &
A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE : 5th February 2015. P.C. 1 The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner on
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition. The learned Counsel
refers to affidavit filed by the Respondent No.2-SEBI and submits that the
investigation in respect of the subject matter of this petition is already commenced.
Leave is granted.
2 Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
PIL.16-2014
Indian Council of Investors
Union of India
Naresh H. Patil
A.S. Gadkari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court