Petition challenging pipeline supply issues disposed of. Court found work complete and future decisions adhere to procedure.
Petition disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL86-12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 86/2012
(ASHOK GULABCHAND BHUTADA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 4, 2015.
Perused the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.2.
It is submitted that the work of extension of the pipeline from Umarsara Distribution Pipeline to Sai Nagar and Malani Nagar is already over. It further states that as and when the applications are received for supply of tap connections, the same would be decided in accordance with the procedure.
In that view of the matter, petition has served its purpose. The same is, therefore, disposed of. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
Ashok Gulabchand Bhutada
State of Maharashtra
Others
B.R. Gavai
Mridula Bhathkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
