This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04022015pilno.113.2013 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
P.I.L. No. 113 of 2013
Shekhar s/o Krushnarao Augad vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.
Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s or directions and Registrar's orders. Orders.
Mr. S.S.Shingane, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr. A.M.Deshpande, AGP for R-1.
CORAM: B.R.GAVAI & MRS. MRIDULA R. BHATKAR,JJ DATE : 4.2.2015
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
in view of the subsequent development, the grievances of the petitioner no more survive. The petition is disposed of as having served the purpose.
JUDGE JUDGE
patle
04022015pilno.113.2013 2
Shekhar Augad
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
Mrs. Mridula R. Bhathkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
