A writ petition was called first in the morning and then in the afternoon session. The petitioners did not appear in either session. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP2671-3.2
1/1
PNP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2671 OF 2014
Maruti Pandurang Shinde and another versus State of Maharashtra and others
...Petitioners.
..Respondents.
None for the Petitioners. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for the State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL & A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
3rd February, 2015.
P.C. :
None appeared for the Petitioners when the matter was called out in the morning session and hence, the matter was kept back. On the second call i.e. in the afternoon session also nobody is present for and on behalf of the Petitioners. Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Naresh H. Patil, J.)
(A.S. Gadkari, J.)
Maruti Pandurang Shinde and another
State of Maharashtra and others
NARESH H. PATIL
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
