Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The court granted leave. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.598-2015
Dond
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2015
Balwant Parsu Katkar ..Petitioner.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. H.S. Venegavkar i/b Ashok Purohit & Co., for Petitioner. Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL &
A.S. GADKARI, JJ.
DATE : 5th February 2015.
P.C.
Heard.
2 The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner on
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition.
Leave is granted.
3 Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
wp.598-2015
Balwant Parsu Katkar
The State of Maharashtra
NARESH H. PATIL
A. S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
