Disposed

Shri Pratap R. Yadav v. Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Dec 2014PIL/247/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In PIL 247 of 2014, the Bombay High Court permitted the petitioner to file a comprehensive representation with the Commissioner of Thane Municipal Corporation regarding the subject matter of the petition, which would be reviewed on its merits, before disposing of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to petitioner to file comprehensive representation with the Commissioner for review on merits; writ petition disposed of.

Shri Pratap R. Yadav Vs Thane Municipal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

pil 247.14.sxw

¶2

1/1

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 247 OF 2014

¶5

Shri Pratap R. Yadav	...	Petitioner
V/s.
Thane Municipal Corporation & ors.	...	Respondents

¶6

Mr. C.S. Joshi for the petitioners.

¶7

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ .

¶8

12th December, 2014.

¶9

P.C.

¶10

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶11

Petitioner is entitled to file comprehensive representation in respect of subject matter of the petition to the Commissioner, Thane Municipal Corporation. In case the representation is received, it shall be looked into in accordance with its own merits.

¶12

3. With these observations and directions, writ petition is disposed of.

¶13

(A.P. BHANGALE, J.)

¶14

L.S. Panjwani, P.S.

Shri Pratap R. Yadav v. Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Pratap R. Yadav v. Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharavi Baitt Bachao Samiti and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dr. Babulal K. Shah Vs the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Sanjay Bhaskar Kale Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Vitthal Mahapurao Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anil Mohanlal Kankriya Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sidheshwar Machhindra Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajamma Vishwanath Sassatte Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Swast Dhanya Dukandar Sanghatana, Jalna Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

New Maharashtra Education Society through Its Secretary Vs Sangli Miraj Kupwad Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Khatoon Minority Womens Social Welfare and Educational Societys Rms Institute of Pharmacy Vs Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education and Ors.

Chandrakant Baburao Gondhali Vs Dy. Director of Social Welfare Pune

M/S. Paranjape Schemes Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr. Sujit Himmatlal Mutha and Anr.

M/S. Paranjape Schemes Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr. Sujit Himmatlal Mutha and Anr.

Smt. Kamala Devi Ramchandra Vaishnav Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Minister of Urban Development Dept and Ors.