Sanjay Bhaskar Kale v. the State of Mah and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/25/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶2
916 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 25 OF 2012
¶3
SANJAY BHASKAR KALE
¶4
VERSUS
¶5
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
¶6
Mrs. AV Gondhalekar, AGP for Respondent/State
Mr. V.R. Dhorde For R-2
¶7
Mr. Joshi Arvind Ramakant For,8,10,12,14,15,16,19;
Mr.Hon Vinayak D.for R/4
¶8
Mr. Tambe Rahul A. For R/4 And 9;
Mr. A S Gandhi For, Adv. R/13
¶9
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ.
Dated: March 22, 2016
¶10
PER COURT :-
¶11
1)In spite of service of notice, Party-in-person is
¶12
not present.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sanjay Bhaskar Kale
- respondent
The State of Mah
Coram
AI extract
R. M. Borde
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court