Civil Application wherein the High Court rejected the prayer for stay of possession but stayed the direction to pay a specific monetary amount pending furnishing of security by appellants within four weeks.
Stayed the direction to pay Rs. 1,93,204/- on furnishing of security within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
caf430.14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 430 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2014 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2014
M/s. Paranjape Schemes Constructions Pvt. Ltd. ... Applicant V/s. Mr. Sujit Himmatlal Mutha & anr. ... Respondents
Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni for the appellants. Ms. Gauri Godse for respondent no.1.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A.P. BHANGALE, JJ .
12th December, 2014.
P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2/2 caf430.14.sxw
applicant is not inclined to settle the matter and prays for interim-relief.
O R D E R
(a) The prayer for grant of stay to hand over possession of the Bungalow No. A-7 to plaintiff stands rejected.
(b) The directions to pay plaintiff an amount of Rs. 1,93,204/- (Rupees One Lakh Ninety Three Thousand Two Hundred and Four only) stands stayed on appellants furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court within four weeks from today.
(A.P. BHANGALE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for stay of possession handed over to plaintiff should be granted.
M/s. Paranjape Schemes Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
Mr. Sujit Himmatlal Mutha
NARESH H. PATIL
A.P. BHANGALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
