Sidheshwar Machhindra Shinde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This PIL Petition sought to mandate an enquiry regarding appointments and postings at Veterinary Hospitals. The Court found no specific representation necessitating direct intervention, granting leaves to file a representation within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
Leave to make a representation within eight weeks; respondents to scrutinize within sixteen weeks if representation is filed.
What the court decided
(1) PIL No. 135 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Public Interest Litigation No. 135 of 2014
Sidheshwar s/o. Machhindra Shinde, Aged about 35 years, Occupation : Advocate, R/o. At - Kambi, Post - Kamkheda, Taluka & District : Beed. .. Petitioner.
versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development & Fisheries Department, Mantrtalaya, Mumbai - 400 032, & 5 others. .. Respondents.
Mr. Sandesh R. Patil, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Tope, Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE : 15TH DECEMBER 2014
COURT'S ORDER (Per B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct an enquiry into appointments and postings at upgraded Veterinary Hospitals under Zilla Parishad, Beed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sidheshwar s/o. Machhindra Shinde
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
B.P. Dharmadhikari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court