In a public interest litigation, an advocate for the petitioner appears and seeks leave to withdraw. The court grants leave and dismisses the petition as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL 17/14
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.17/2014
Vilas Haribhau Wankhede.
...Petitioner..
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others.
...Respondents...
.....
Shri P.B. Patil, Advocate for petitioner.
Shri S.V. Kurundkar, Govt.Pleader for respondent no.1.
Shri A.B. Girase, Advocate for respondent no.4.
.....
CORAM: R.M. BORDE &
A.M. BADAR, JJ.
DATE: 11.03.2014
ORDER :
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions
seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave is granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
ndk/c1131427
Vilas Haribhau Wankhede
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court