Ameet Bhaskar Satam v. the State of Maharashtra, through Public Prosecutor and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/154/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil154
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.154 OF 2014
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Ayaz Khan i/b Zehra Charania for the Petitioner
Ms M.P.Thakur, AGP for the State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ.
DATE : JULY 21,2014.
P.C.
1The entire cause of action has
arisen in Greater Mumbai. Accordingly,
we transfer this petition to the
Original Side. Consequential amendment
shall be carried out by the petitioner
within a period of two weeks from
today.
(A.S.CHANDURKAR,J)(A.S.OKA,J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether PIL is maintainable under Public Interest Litigation No.154 of 2014.
Whether cause of action requires transfer to Original Side.
Pil
State
A.S.Oka
A.S.Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court