In Writ Petition No.596 of 2013, the petitioner, a minor, challenged an order before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The two-judge bench rejected the petition for reasons recorded separately in the accompanying judgment, disposing of the matter with dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp596
1
ssp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.596 OF 2013
Varsha Raju Chavan minor
through its father and natural
guardian Shri Raju Damlu Chavan...Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr.V.A.Madane i/b Mr.Chintamani Bhangoji for the
Petitioner
Mr.V.S.Gokhale, AGP for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
A.S.CHANDURKAR, JJ.
DATE : JULY 21,2014
P.C.:
1For the reasons separately recorded in the
Judgment, we reject the petition.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition contained herein deserves to be allowed.
Varsha Raju Chavan minor through its father and natural guardian Shri Raju Damlu Chavan
State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A.S.Oka
A.S.Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court