PIL petition for data for Aadhar Cards. Court disposed of file directing Union of India to treat it as representation and decide within four weeks.
Direction to consider petition as representation and decide within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 of 2 PIL(L).25.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO.25 OF 2014
Matoshri Health Trust Petitioner versus The Union of India and others Respondents
Respondents
Mr.Jamshed Mistry with D.U.Siroya for Petitioner.
Mr.Rajeev Chavan with Smt.S.V.Bharucha for Respondent no.1.
Ms.Geeta Shastry, Addl.G.P. For Respondent State.
Mr.Pradeep Rajgopal i/by Ms.Rekha Rajgopal for Respondents 2 and 3.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. AND M.S.SANKLECHA, J.
DATE : 14 March 2014
PC :
2 of 2 PIL(L).25.2014
is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent nos.1 and 2 to consider this writ petition as a representation and to take appropriate decision thereon as expeditiously as possible preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt of an order of this Court. The PIL stands disposed of.
(CHIEF JUSTICE)
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
MST
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition praying for direction to provide data for Aadhar Cards should be disposed of by considering itself as a representation.
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of expeditiously within four weeks.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Matoshri Health Trust
The Union of India
MOHIT S. SHAH
M.S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
