COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT…
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file applications in pending PIL No.101 of 2012.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 16 OF 2013 SHAIKH ABDUL RAHIM ISAK VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri T. M. Venjane AGP for Respondents: Shri S.K.Tambe
WITH
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 17 OF 2013 MANOJ SHIVAJIRAO DONGRE
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Shri Sandipan N. Morampalle AGP for Respondents: Shri S.G.Nandedkar
CORAM : S.B.DESHMUKH & M.T. JOSHI, JJ. Dated: February 14, 2013
PER COURT :-
1. Heard respective counsel.
( M.T. JOSHI, J. ) ( S.B.DESHMUKH, J. )
akl
SHAIKH ABDUL RAHIM ISAK
MANOJ SHIVAJIRAO DONGRE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.B. DESHMUKH
M.T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
