The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed the Public Interest Litigation by the Ajanta Taluka Formation Committee. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition, which was allowed with liberty to seek an alternate remedy.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed with liberty to seek appropriate alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
PIL13-13
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE, CIVIL JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2013
AJANTA TALUKA FORMATION COMMITTEE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Deshmukh
Javed Abdul H.
G.P. for Respondent/ State: Mr. S. V.
Kurundkar.
***
CORAM:S. B. DESHMUKH &
M. T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: 15th FEBRUARY, 2013
PER COURT:
1.Learned counsel Mr. Javed Deshmukh for
the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks
withdrawal of this petition with liberty to
seek appropriate alternate remedy. Learned
Government Pleader has no objection.
2.P.I.L. stands dismissed as withdrawan
with liberty as prayed.
[M. T. JOSHI, J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dt.15/02/2013
ans/PIL13-13
AJANTA TALUKA FORMATION COMMITTEE
THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
S. B. DESHMUKH
M. T. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court