Prasad B. Hiray v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition challenging road construction is disposed of as the construction was completed in 2009, leaving nothing to consider.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
79.09.doc
1
SQP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.79 OF 2009
Prasad B.Hiray Versus
...Petitioners
Union of India & Ors.
...Respondents
Mr.Shivraj R.Patil for Petitioners
Mr.S.K.Chari i/b M.V.Kini & Co. for Respondent No.2
Mr.M.N.Sandhyanshiv for Respondent No.4
CORAM:- A.M.KHANWILKAR AND K.K.TATED, JJ. DATED:- FEBRUARY 12, 2013
P.C.
the concerned road has been completed in the year 2009.
present petition. The same is disposed of.
(K.K.TATED, J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.)
1/1
SQ Pathan
Prasad B. Hiray
Union of India
A.M. Khanwilkar
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court