The applicants sought withdrawal of this criminal application. The court observed the filing of the chargesheet and allowed withdrawal with liberty to apply for discharge before the competent court.
Application dismissed as withdrawn, liberty to apply for discharge before the competent court granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2711 OF 2011
(Wahidkhan Yusufkhan and ors. VS The State of Maharashtra and ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or Judge's Orders orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. R.R. Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicants Smt. S.D. Shelke, A.P.P. for the respondent-State Mr. S.V. Gundre, Advocate h/f. Mr. V.D. Gunale, Advocate for the respondent no.2
CORAM : S.B. DESHMUKH &
M.T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : 13.02.2013
P.C.:-
arp
Sd/Sd/- [M. T. JOSHI, J. ] [S.B. DESHMUKH, J. ]
Wahidkhan Yusufkhan and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
S.B. Deshmukh
M.T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
