The High Court observed the State Government's commitment to start new primary and upper-primary schools for the academic years 2012-13 and 2013-14 and disposed of the public interest litigation accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.91.2009.6.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 91 OF 2009
MAHARASHTRA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ORGANISATION :- PETITIONER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
Mr. Sachin S. Pande, for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. B. Vagyani, AGP, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Ravindra A. Lokhande, for Respondent No. 3.
CORAM :- A.M.KHANWILKAR & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATED :- FEBRUARY 15, 2013
P.C. :-
Heard Counsel for the parties.
Page 1 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
PIL.91.2009.6.doc
commitment made by the State Government to start new primary and upper-primary schools during the academic years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, nothing more is required to be done except to observe that the said commitment will be taken to its logical end.
(K.K.TATED,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 2 of 2
J.V.Salunke,PA
Maharashtra Federation of Teachers Organisation
State of Maharashtra
Respondent Nos.
Respondent No. 3
A.M. Khanwilkar
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court