The High Court dismissed the criminal writ petition citing withdrawal by the petitioner with liberty to seek discharge, noting no objection from the respondent's counsel.
Withdrawal of the writ petition granted with liberty to seek discharge before the competent court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
CRWP116-13
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 116 OF 2013
GAJANAN UTTAMRAO SHINDE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Jadhav N.L.
APP for Respoondent/ state: Mr. S. G.
Nandedkar.
***
CORAM: S. B. DESHMUKH & M. T. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 15th FEBRUARY, 2013
PER COURT:
1.We have learned counsel for the
parties present before the Court. Mr.
Jadhav, on instructions, seeks withdrawal
of the writ petition with liberty to seek
discharge before the competent Court in
accordance with the provisions of law.
Lerarned A.P.P. has no objection.
2.Writ petition is dismissed as
CRWP116-13
-:(2):-
withdrawn with liberty as sought.
3.We have expressed no opinion on any
issue.
[M. T. JOSHI, J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dt.15/02/2013
ans/CRWP116-13
Gajanan Uttamrao Shinde
The State of Maharashtra
S. B. Deshmukh
M. T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court