Ex-parte order disposing of a public interest litigation as infructuous due to subsequent developments.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PIL.177.2010.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 177 OF 2010
VIKAS RAGHUNATH PATIL AND ORS. :- PETITIONERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. :- RESPONDENTS
Mr. Sandesh Deshpande, for the Petitioner.
Ms. J. S. Pawar, Addl. GP, for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. S. R. Ganbavale, for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
Mr. S. V. Sadavarte, for Respondent No. 6.
CORAM :- A.M.KHANWILKAR & K.K.TATED,JJ. DATED :- FEBRUARY 21, 2013
P.C. :-
Counsel for the Petitioner submits that in view of subsequent development, this Petition has become infructuous. Hence, disposed of.
(K.K.TATED,J.) (A.M.KHANWILKAR,J.)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PA
VIKAS RAGHUNATH PATIL AND ORS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
A.M.KHANWILKAR
K.K.TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court