The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed a criminal writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, noting that a related reference had already been dismissed by the Magistrate.
Criminal Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-:(1):-
CRWP1091-12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD. APPELLATE SIDE, CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
OfficeNotes,Office Court's or Judge's orders.
MemorandaofCoram,
appearance,Court's
orders or directions and
Registrar's orders.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1091 OF 2012
ANAND NAMDEO WATHORE
VERSUS
NAMDEO BALU WATHORE
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Rakhunde
Pravin B .
APP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S. W. Mundhe.
Advocate for Respondent No.2: Mr. B. V.
Wagh.
***
CORAM:S. B. DESHMUKH &
M. T. JOSHI, JJ.
DATED: 15th FEBRUARY, 2013
PER COURT:
1.Heard learned counsel Mr. Rakhunde for
the Petitioner. He submits, on
instructions, that RCC No.135 of 2003 has
been dismissed against the present
Applicant by the learned Judicial
Magistrate, First Class, Ahmedpur, district
Latur. In this view of the matter, Mr.
Rakhunde for the Petitioner seeks
withdrawal of this criminal writ petition.
-:(2):-
CRWP1091-12
2.We have heard learned counsel for
Respondent NO.1 and learned A.P.P. for
Respondent No.2.
3.CriminalWritPetitionstands
dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
[M. T. JOSHI, J.] [S.B.DESHMUKH, J.]
Dt.15/02/2013
ans/CRWP1091-12
Anand Namdeo Wathore
Namdeo Balu Wathore
S. B. Deshmukh
M. T. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court