This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
krs
caw967.06
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL APPLICATION NO.967 OF 2006
In
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.46 OF 2001
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
None present for the applicant. Ms M.P.Thakur, A.G.P. for resp. nos.1 & 2.
CORAM : D.D. SINHA & SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2012. P.C.:
Counsel for the applicant absent. C.A.
No.967 of 2006 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(D.D. SINHA, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Applicant
RESP. NOS.1 & 2
D.D. SINHA
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
