Disposed
Abdul Nasr Abdul Samad Jalal v. Divisional Commissioner and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/46/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
P.I.L. NO. 46 OF 2011
Abdul Nasir Abdul Samad Jalal
.. Petitioner
Vs
Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Divn & Ors .. Respondents
Mr. Saripatta Sarnath i/b Mr. Mihir Desai for the Petitioner
Mr. S.R. Nargolkar, GP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 8
CORAM : D. D. SINHA &
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ
DATE : 15th MARCH, 2012.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to efflux of time, the cause of action involved in the present P.I.L. no more survives, hence, P.I.L. is disposed of as infructuous.
[ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J ]
[ D. D. SINHA, J ]
Amberkar
1 of 1
Abdul Nasir Abdul Samad Jalal
Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Divn
D. D. Sinha
V. K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court