Writ petition disposed of on the undertaking by respondents to act upon petitioners' averments. No substantive decision or reasoning recorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 24 OF 2009
Pravin Bhimrao Wadmare and another. Vs.
State of Maharashtra and others.
... Petitioners
... Respondents
Mr. M.S. Karnik for the petitioners.
Mr. R.P. Behere, Additional Government Pleader for the State. Mr. S.R. Ganbavale for the respondent No.4.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. DATE : 26TH FEBRUARY, 2009
P.C.:
The learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents viz. State and the Corporation submit that the competent authorities will look into the averments made in this writ petition and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and even take necessary action without any further delay as expeditiously as possible.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Pravin Bhimrao Wadmare and another
State of Maharashtra and others
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
