The High Court dismissed a PIL as indefinable and not maintainable without entertaining it, granting liberty for future proper representation.
Liberty to petitioner to make proper representation to competent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.17 OF 2009
Maza Bharat Samajik Sanstha. Petitioner
Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Shri J.P. Kharge for the Petitioner. Shri R.P. Behre, APP for State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J DATED : 5th MARCH, 2009.
P.C.
In this Petition, the prayers made on oath are indefinite and
to some extent they are not even maintainable. Hence, we do not propsoe to entertain the Petition and the same accordingly is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to make proper representation to the Competent Authority if he so desires with no order as to costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,
J
Maza Bharat Samajik Samstha
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
