This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 39 OF 2008
M/s. Sahyog Trust’s
Human Rights and Law Defenders (HRLD) .. Petitioner
Versus
The Director General of Health Services
& Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Shekhar Jagtap i/b. J.Shekhar for the petitioner.
Mr. P.M.Patil, AGP for the respondents.
CORAM: J.N.PATEL &
R.V.MORE,JJ.
DATE: 18th February, 2009.
P.C.
. The learned Counsel for the petitioner is not
able to satisfy us as to how the subject matter of the
petition can be treated as Public Interest Litigation.
Therefore, the petition is dismissed.
(J.N.PATEL,J.)
2
(R.V.MORE,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition qualifies as a Public Interest Litigation given the petitioner's inability to establish the case.
M/s. Sahyog Trust’s Human Rights and Law Defenders (HRLD)
The Director General of Health Services & Ors.
J.N.Patel
R.V.More
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court