Public Interest Litigation withdrawn by counsel for petitioners. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to liberty to take legally permissible steps.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take such steps as are permissible in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 60 OF 2006
National Alliance of Peoples
Movement & Ors. ..... ... Petitioners.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors... .... Respondents.
Mr.Mihir Desai for the Petitioners.
Mr.Pradeep Jadhav, AGP for the State.
Mr.G.Utangale i/by Utangale & Co., for
Respondent No.7.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel for the petitioners wishes to
withdraw this petition with liberty to take such steps
as are permissible in accordance with law. Petition
dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
National Alliance of Peoples Movement
Ors.
State of Maharashtra
Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court