The applicant withdrew civil application No. 65 of 2007 in PIL No. 116 of 2005. The Bombay High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn subject to a liberty to take further legal steps.
Civil application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take legal steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 65 OF 2007
IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 116 OF 2005
Dinesh D. Kamat... ...... ... Applicant.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors... .....Respondents.
Mr. Sushil Nimbkar for the Applicant.
Mr. P.M.Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 20TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.:
The main writ petition has already been dismissed
by an order dated 29th August, 2007.
2. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant wishes
to withdraw this application with liberty to take such
steps as are permissible in law. The civil
application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for.
Sd/-
CHIEFJUSTICE
Sd/-
-: 2 :-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Dinesh D. Kamat
State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court